When two high-ranking officials clash over security protocols, it’s more than just a disagreement—it’s a debate about accountability and transparency.
Uganda’s Chief of Defence Forces, Gen Muhoozi Kainerugaba, has publicly disagreed with Internal Affairs State Minister Gen David Muhoozi over whether security personnel should be identifiable while on duty.
This clash comes amid growing scrutiny of the Joint Anti-terrorism Task Force (JAT) and their controversial operations.
The Heart of the Disagreement
The debate began when Minister Muhoozi criticized the JATT for their appearance during the Kawempe North by-election campaigns.
The task force had drawn public outrage for wearing masks and hoods, obscuring their identities while conducting operations.
In a parliamentary session, Minister Muhoozi called the practice “unacceptable.” He argued that law enforcement officers must be clearly identifiable to uphold accountability.
“If you are enforcing the law, you must be properly identified,” he stated.
He emphasized the importance of following established rules of engagement, adding, “We have booklets written for officers, so we shouldn’t tire in our quest to enforce the law correctly.”
Related: Tayebwa Slams Security Agencies Over Torture in Kawempe North By-Election
Gen Muhoozi’s Counterargument
Gen Muhoozi Kainerugaba, however, took to X to challenge this stance.
“I disagree with General David Muhoozi. There is no requirement for security personnel to be identified! None at all!” he wrote.
He also defended the JATT, praising their role in Uganda’s security framework.
“Who are they?? They are Ugandan Security, and they are doing a GREAT job!” he tweeted last week.
This public disagreement highlights a deeper divide within Uganda’s security apparatus. While Minister Muhoozi stresses transparency, Gen Muhoozi Kainerugaba prioritizes operational flexibility.
Related: Gen Muhoozi Praises JATT Amidst Controversy in Kawempe North
The Broader Implications
The JAT’s actions have sparked widespread debate, particularly after their confrontations with National Unity Platform (NUP) supporters and journalists. Critics argue that unidentified officers undermine public trust and accountability.
Abdallah Kiwanuka, MP for Mukono North, raised concerns about the new dress code allowing full facial coverage.
“How can we hold officers accountable if we don’t know who they are?” he questioned.
This clash between the two officials reflects a broader tension between security and transparency.
As Uganda grapples with these issues, the question remains: Can law enforcement balance operational effectiveness with public accountability?
Key Takeaways
- Minister Muhoozi’s Stance: Security personnel must be identifiable to ensure accountability.
- Gen Muhoozi’s View: Identification is not necessary for effective operations.
- Public Concerns: Unidentified officers erode trust and complicate accountability.
